Pennock’s problematic paper, “Can’t Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion?”, has recently appeared the typically respectable journal Synthese. I’ve already criticized Pennock’s paper here and here, and I have nothing more to say about it. But I did want to pass along this nice critique of Pennock’s paper, by Paul Newall.
December 2010
Monthly Archive
December 29, 2010
A nice critique of Pennock’s paper
Posted by bradleymonton under PennockComments Off on A nice critique of Pennock’s paper
December 10, 2010
This great article highlights some of the exact points I talk about in the last chapter of my book — that we need to teach students how to think about big-picture issues associated with science, so they can better understand why scientists reason the way they do.